Also make the damn upvote buttons bigger on mobile.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilico...
supercalifragilisticexpialadocious
Also this may be a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googlewhack :) well back in the day
Not according to SNL's translation of it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eBG8JIGugw
I hope you will not object if I also offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities.
Thus, I’m anaspeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulations.
May I offer you a pendigestatery interludicule? Anything I can do to facilitate your velocitous extramuralisation.
as for it screwing with mobile site width, on desktop FF putting width small seems to work fine as the word seems to have soft hyphens in it? Because it splits at the window edge with a hyphen in place.
Thank goodness Joyce doesn't have the record with his invented words in Finnegans Wake.
Silphium similarly had much demand as an aphrodisiac.
This hybrid likely grew in the African Mediterranean and the high demand for it, alongside its inability to reproduce through seed, is probably what led to its extinction.
As the word-setter this might be an own-goal. As a word guesser, a random haphazard tactic might get you the word.
I'll Monte-Carlo my point but I have a warm bath tub waiting...
[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Protologisms/Long_wo...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taumatawhakatangi%C2%ADhangako...
The key problem for me is that you would never refer to any polypeptide this way in a sentence. It would be like referring to a piece of software by concatenating its source code into one long 'word'. Meaningless.
Next up will they start recording the corresponding DNA sequences as "words" that are a synonym?
Presumably not on other browsers, though, as lots of people were complaining.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/future/article/20170907-the-mystery-of...
The Ferula genus contains fennel and asafoetida (aka hing). Ferula drudeana is suspected to be one of the species that was hybridized.
-has weird succulent morphology as depicted in coinage
Eg https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/75379-Aloe-maculata
-species that grow well (only) in the relevant regions in North Africa
-sap much less sulfurous than hing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloin
-Pliny mentions silphium as laxative/purgative
-Most of all, explains why the leading theory is still so unsatisfactory
One of the great archeological finds of this decade(https://www.livescience.com/ancient-odeon-discovered-crete) was discovered in Lissus(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lissus_(Crete)) in 2022. A great hike from Sougia for those interested, the place truly is beautiful.
Plato argued that The Clouds (which is sharp satire of Socrates and his school) was in part what got Socrates convicted and killed. This is obviously debatable but Aristophanes certainly didn't self-censor or mince words.
I mean, has any linguist noticed this? The ability to (again in principle) embed infinitely many sentences is AFAIK an argument for the infinite generativity of natural language. Can the same argument be supported at the word-level also? And does anyone know whether it has?
Also, I think in German it's very common to string together words like that to form longer words. Are there more languages with that characteristic?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agglutinative_language
Important knowledge for those suffering from hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia.
A slightly more thorough discussion from an actual linguist: https://youtu.be/tfnANe2YUwM?si=LAxriH-RuqmUgrxl.
Yes.
> Also, I think in German it's very common to string together words like that to form longer words. Are there more languages with that characteristic?
Yes. All of them.
> Can the same argument be supported at the word-level also?
Here it depends what you mean by "the word-level". "Words" are commonly taken to be compositionally opaque. Compound expressions are not compositionally opaque and are not "words" in this sense.
Just started relearning Ancient Greek after twenty years and I highly recommend Cambridge Greek Lexicon.
> nirantarāndhakāritā-digantara-kandaladamanda-sudhārasa-bindu-sāndratara-ghanāghana-vr̥nda-sandehakara-syandamāna-makaranda-bindu-bandhuratara-mākanda-taru-kula-talpa-kalpa-mr̥dula-sikatā-jāla-jaṭila-mūla-tala-maruvaka-miladalaghu-laghu-laya-kalita-ramaṇīya-pānīya-śālikā-bālikā-karāra-vinda-galantikā-galadelā-lavaṅga-pāṭala-ghanasāra-kastūrikātisaurabha-medura-laghutara-madhura-śītalatara-saliladhārā-nirākariṣṇu-tadīya-vimala-vilocana-mayūkha-rekhāpasārita-pipāsāyāsa-pathika-lokān
It's not actually the longest though; e.g. here's someone asking how to get TeX to hyphenate a routine compound that would be about 1361 characters long in transliteration: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/404690/how-to-make-a...
> Is there really a 797 character long word in Sanskrit?
> Yes its ! Some times even the book completely will be like this. What is the solution?
• It is not merely a string of independent adjectives; there's a progression of ideas from one morpheme to the next, just as in any compound. Try here: https://dharmamitra.org/?target_lang=english-explained&input...