Ask HN: We need a standard way to declare how much AI was used in a PR
2 points by heeton 4 hours ago | 3 comments
There's a big difference between these situations:

- a PR that is quickly drafted by LLM based on a prompt

- a careful spec designed by humans, worked on by AI

- a feature built with a dev and LLM closely working together, with code reviews

- a feature with parts fixed up by AI, but 90% human written

- human written, checked with AI

etc

Is anyone moving towards a standard way of describing this? I'd love something that can go at the bottom of an communication / PR / proposal.

  • jjgreen 4 hours ago |

       [ ] Was AI used in this PR in any way at all?
    • heeton 4 hours ago |
      Sardonic but not useful.
  • genrus00 4 hours ago |
    I believe that it isn't that important to quantify how much AI is involved in a PR. It's not possible to measure it other than asking and right now it isn't even a good metric. LLMs could be producing good code and a human could be producing really bad code. As somebody said, just ask if AI was in any way involved in the coding process and treat the code as such.