This pretty much sums up the whole article, and it makes perfect sense.
So much was going to happen anyway that you really do have to look away from the technology to answer why.
I would say GPTs didn't come earlier because sama didn't have enough high-dollar contacts yet who would extend their confidence to him.
And then what you get is little hops done big because that's whats already familiar to the big money owners.
So LLMs are first out of the gate to reach impressive capabilities, but something completely unfamiliar that may be superior due to purposeful design including fundamental principles will have to lag behind until a very big change would become possible.
1. Someone with enough conviction of end goal which is agi
2. That someone with enough capital or agency to pursue it
3. Enough capital to explore all options - at that time we didn’t know about transformers
4. Enough smartness to know what ideas to not purse and which ones to prioritise
As things got cheaper, it allowed more people to explore.
A few years later I saw - neural network projects which can do basic image recognition - a paid smartphone app that can count objects instantly - determine the mood of an online comment after you trained on a sample
I never imagined a tool that packages all knowledge and requires no training on my part.
For that, I thought of making a Windows 2000 style GUI using pure WinAPI, backporting llama.cpp and bundling Qwen3-0.6B. Never started this though.