That's a general problem I often run into with simulations. When you get it in the opposite direction it can have some very amusing results (e.g. energy in a physical system continues to increase).
They explain why this happens in the article.
> Publishing this may mean the method is no longer something special.
Surely it's at least understandable why the author could be feeling a bit sad about it?
When you made something public domain pre-LLMs, you generally could expect people to give kudos to you.
With LLMs, if you make something public and an LLM gobbles it up, not only you get zero credit but you also can’t convincingly claim to have come up with it (since anyone can just assume you used an LLM), and neither can anyone else (even if they have come up with it fully independently).
If you don’t seek any recognition for your original work, then that’s fine, but I suspect you might be in a minority.
Using connectedness and unity to defend the fragmentation of the social bond is ironic, to say the least.
Show some empathy, the world is far from connected and united.