• 9cb14c1ec0 11 hours ago |
    God forbid animals should be allowed to have any freedom. As we all know, they best taken care of by forcing them to remain indoors 24/7.
    • nomel 11 hours ago |
      We tried to adopt a cat once from a local shelter. If there was any indication that you would let the cat outside, for any period of time, they would reject the application. Also, if there was any indication you would ever leave the cat alone for 10 hours or more, they would reject the application. So, we left all those cats in the shelter, where there were almost certainly terminated, and bought a kitten from some random people on craigslist.

      After that cat passed, we tried to adopt a dog from the local shelters. All required an interview and house visit, with random unscheduled visits within the 6 months after. We bought a puppy from some random kid.

      edit: "any indication that you would let the cat outside" and "outdoor cat" are not the same thing. I failed because I said we had a patio we would let the cat sit on, in nice weather, on the second floor, or because we were going to see if we could leash train it (my friend had with his cat). I don't know, the lady seemed very angry the whole interview. The leash training failed before it made its way outdoors, but the sun was enjoyed.

      • triceratops 11 hours ago |
        You're allowed to lie on your application to the shelter. But you should also not let your cat outside because cats are bird murder machines.

        A house visit to adopt a dog seems excessive. But this might be organizational scar tissue: mentally ill people adopting and hoarding animals, for example.

        Depending on the jurisdiction, any adoption contract that says you have to allow unscheduled visits 6 months after may not be enforceable. Treat your adopted pet well and tell anyone who interferes to f off.

        • dearing 11 hours ago |
          This is wild speculation and almost intentionally muddy.

          - Cats are natural, suburb density is probably not. Homestead cats have a place as long as we stock food.

          - Anything involving money to support AN org should have stringent red tape.

          - telling people to fuck off is okay

          • Rebelgecko 11 hours ago |
            By what metric are domesticated cats "natural"?
            • jandrewrogers 10 hours ago |
              In a lot of ways typical farm cats are more natural than dogs. The distance between those cats and the undomesticated variety isn’t that wide.

              Most domesticated cats demonstrably have no issues thriving while feral. They are not well-adapted to every environment they’ve been introduced but they do pretty well in many. Their main issue in places like North America is prodigious predation in the wild, which is mitigated when living near humans.

      • imglorp 11 hours ago |
        The shelter is doing its job: outdoor cats live a shorter life due to fights, cars, disease, predation, etc. And not only that, but they also decimate the local songbird population, which is already in great decline.
        • swatcoder 10 hours ago |
          If songbirds are your concern, you'd do worlds more for them by getting your neighbors to replace their lawns with shrubbery than by fretting over a couple spoiled cats too stuffed with tinned food to catch anything.
      • chromatin 11 hours ago |
        Outdoor domestic cats are a crime against nature (and songbirds).
        • jandrewrogers 10 hours ago |
          Cats are a part of nature.

          In some parts of the US outdoor cats are an essential bulwark against rodent invasion. It is healthy for the cats and very effective organic rodent control. They do get some birds but the bulk of their activity is rodents. There are places you can’t live without them.

          Depending on the situation, outdoor cats can also live a long time. We had farm cats when I was growing up that spent a large part of their time outdoors during the day. They were smart, social, and typically lived 15-20 years before old age caught up with them.

          Predation mostly impacts cats that are either obviously stupid or aggressively anti-social in my experience.

          • mkl 10 hours ago |
            > Cats are a part of nature.

            Domestic cats are only a part of civilisation, not nature.

        • WarOnPrivacy 9 hours ago |
          > Outdoor domestic cats are a crime against nature (and songbirds).

          As much as red tailed hawks are. And crows (which I've watched eat songbirds).

          • amanaplanacanal 8 hours ago |
            Domestic cats aren't native to any part of North America. They are an invasive species.
      • II2II 11 hours ago |
        Cats are non-trivial to contain in the owner's yard, and will attack other animals. Sometimes that is the intention (e.g. barn cats), other times is unwelcome attacks on wildlife (e.g. birds). My family also had to deal with vet bills due to a cat that attacked our dog. While I wouldn't consider letting a cat outdoors abusive, it is certainly disrespectful to neighbours.

        The other thing about shelters is they often deal with animals from abusive or neglectful homes. Random visits are likely excessive, but they are just trying to prevent the animal from enduring the same situation with new owners (and likely trying to ensure the new owners can handle an animal that has a history of being abused).

      • annzabelle 10 hours ago |
        When I was a kid we adopted two kittens from a local cat rescue. They made us sign a document saying we would never allow the cats outside. One got out when she was a few months old, and she developed an obsession with the outdoors and would spend hours each day scratching at the door and licking her fur off, and occasionally she would escape and us kids would chase her around the yard until we could get her back in. We did the exact same indoor cat enrichment activities with her and her sister, who never developed a desire to get out.

        Eventually we took the one with the outdoors obsession to the vet who told us we could either put her on Prozac or start letting her out. At that point we started letting her out (in our quiet suburb nowhere near a major road), and she instantly became an extremely happy cat. Her sister lived as a happy indoor cat, while she would go out during the day and come in at night. She came back every night and they both lived to pass of kidney disease when they were 15.

        I know a lot of people are extremely against cats going outside, but compared to some of my college friends who kept "emotional support" cats in minuscule dorm rooms, I would much rather let a cat out than imprison it. I don't really buy the songbird thing in built up suburbia.

        • asdff 9 hours ago |
          Not all cats can even hunt. They all like to think the could, yelling at birds, but its an actual skill. Of all 10 cats I had over my life only 1 could actually hunt at all. Even that cat’s own brother could not hunt at all.
          • inemesitaffia 8 hours ago |
            They are usually trained by their mother.
      • ansipunk 9 hours ago |
        I don't get it. I sooooo don't get it. I grew up in a rural area, we had many cats and we really loved all of them. Cats had complete freedom - they'd leave whenever they'd feel like it, they'd go wherever they wanted to go, engaged in social life with other cats including fights over territory and mates, hunted, played, explored, sometimes they'd be gone for days, but they'd always return, love us, stay with us and enjoy our company. I was so happy to let the cats be cats and I am not getting a new cat because I live in an apartment complex and I cannot let it be a cat there, I'd feel horrible about confining it to 40 square meters. I really like to think that the cats I owned got to be cats to its fullest. Unfortunately, they also haven't lived for long, with 4 years being tops due to stray dogs around, cars, other cats, etc, but I'd rather have it that way than treat it like a house fixture.
        • ansipunk 9 hours ago |
          Oh, and we never took a cat from a shelter or from some other institution, we exclusively either adopted stray cats or took one from friends whose cat gave birth. We haven’t sterilized or castrated our cats either and were very responsible about giving away born kittens to people that will take care of them.
        • Paradigma11 6 hours ago |
          Some people like birds. If you look at the cat density in suburbs or villages it is essentially like a horror movie for birds. We feed those cats, so they can exist in a far higher density than the prey population would support but they still have the passion to kill every prey with gusto after toying with it for as long as possible.
          • ansipunk 5 hours ago |
            This doesn't make sense to me. They like birds so much that they want all the cat owners to imprison their cats? But both cats and birds are wild animals. They eat and be eaten. Isn't it just how it works? For animals, it's just the full package.
      • asdff 9 hours ago |
        The reason for all the friction is that terrible people did terrible things to shelter animals. Is it perfect? No, but it is a situation with few better paths forward.
        • bigstrat2003 8 hours ago |
          It's not even particularly good, let alone perfect. Shelters, in my experience, are the poster children for "the perfect is the enemy of the good". They would do a lot more good for the animals in their care by relaxing their standards.
    • II2II 10 hours ago |
      Taken to the other extreme, you have feral dogs. We don't think of them much in urban areas, or even most rural areas, since we will rarely encounter anything more wild than a stray. Being stalked by a pack of feral dogs is not pleasant.
  • jmclnx 11 hours ago |
    Couldn't the tag the dogs ? The picture indicates the dog has no tag.
    • EdwardDiego 11 hours ago |
      That's a stock photo.

      > According to Wissner, his dog was wearing a collar with a rabies tag and a halter bearing a plate with his name, address and contact information.

      • hackernud3s 9 hours ago |
        Maybe add a big old "Don't Rescue Me" tag to that collar.
    • shagie 11 hours ago |
      > Faith, an Akbash whose job was to protect Wissner’s sheep from predators, was nowhere to be found.

      > The sheep were still grazing on the other side of the fence, but their guardian had vanished.

      > ...

      > According to Wissner, his dog was wearing a collar with a rabies tag and a halter bearing a plate with his name, address and contact information.

      The caption for the photo:

      > Shepherdess Brittany Cole Bush with a herd of goats on the Arambel Ranch in western Wyoming. (Brittany Cole Bush)

  • setgree 11 hours ago |
    The lead story is that someone took a dog with tags and contact info, didn’t call the owners took it to a shelter instead, then the shelter didn’t call the owner either. Finally, the owner calls the police and finds out what happened.

    Either there’s a huge lack of common sense at many places here or this story is leaving some details out.

    • jnellis 11 hours ago |
      It's possible people don't like sheep ranchers. Or maybe its just that one rancher. We have the goat herders in our area that fence off parts of the undeveloped land during the summer because it's a fire hazard. Those guardian dogs never leave the fenced area, and they will let you know when you are too close very quickly.
    • sen 10 hours ago |
      > a new neighbor had spotted Faith just outside a fence on Wissner’s property

      Wording could be taken either way, and I could be wrong, but it almost sounds like the dog was not on the property of its owner, and was over the fence in the neighbours property?

      We have a huge problem with pet cats that stray from their properties and eat birds/fish/etc in neighbouring properties... if one turns up on my property, I trap it and send it to the shelter specifically so the owner gets fined, even though I know who owns it. It's what our local council/government recommend we do considering the owners already know it's illegal for pet cats to be off their property here (or even outside of their house after dark, which is almost always when we trap them in our yard).

      • graton 10 hours ago |
        > Faith was outside the livestock fence but still on Wissner's property, he said.
      • andrewflnr 10 hours ago |
        > it's illegal for pet cats to be off their property here

        So, is it deliberate that this is indistinguishable from making outside cats illegal? Otherwise how the heck are owners supposed to ensure cats stay on their property?

        • stuporglue 10 hours ago |
          > Otherwise how the heck are owners supposed to ensure cats stay on their property?

          Sounds like that's their problem to figure out, and I think that's right. I would 1000 times rather have more birds at my feeders than the neighbor's cat pooping in my yard, hunting birds and bothering my dog.

          Let them put in a good fence, electric collar, leash with one of those zip line things - whatever they have to do.

          • desolate_muffin 10 hours ago |
            Reasonable. I like cats well enough, but I find that cat owners are usually very irrational about people disliking other people's cats causing issues, especially compared to dog owners. I don't really understand why.
            • JumpCrisscross 9 hours ago |
              Dogs are easier to train and control than cats. A dog being a menace outside can be put on a leash. That's not always an option for a cat, which in practice means the cat owner knowing the only option is to confine their cat indoors. Which many don't want to do. (Mine gets semi-supervised time outside. I put a GPS collar on him from time to time, however, and he doesn't go far and comes back quite quickly. He's also seventeen and so past his most urgent hunting days, though we did have an issue with him letting in an elk last winter.)
            • expedition32 3 hours ago |
              Cats are like us. They don't give a fuck and consider the planet their private resort. It's what I like about them.
        • behringer 10 hours ago |
          Outdoor domestic cats should be illegal. They destroy the ecosystem. You should be thankful parent does not trap and kill the animals.
          • pasquinelli 9 hours ago |
            > You should be thankful parent does not trap and kill the animals.

            you know how crazy you sound?

            • Affric 9 hours ago |
              That’s genuinely what happens here.
        • lelanthran 9 hours ago |
          > Otherwise how the heck are owners supposed to ensure cats stay on their property?

          I have an electric fence; cats sense it and avoid it. 20+ years without a cat getting off the property.

        • idiotsecant 8 hours ago |
          I didn't get an 'outside cat' that shits in my yard and kills my songbirds.

          If you'd like that pleasure, you're welcome to it. You just don't get to inflict your particular masochist tendencies on your neighbors.

      • jimmydddd 10 hours ago |
        One spring a bird built a nest in a tree outside my 80 yr old grandmother's kitchen window. She watched the nest every day and then the eggs hatched. The next day a neighbor's outdoor cat climbed the tree and killed all the baby birds. My grandmother complained to the neighbors but they didn't see what the problem was. Oh well.
        • hackernud3s 9 hours ago |
          The problem is that cats have trouble detecting which birds have backstories.
      • conductr 9 hours ago |
        No need to guess…

        > In Faith's case, Wissner said, the neighbor apparently didn't realize the fence line and property line weren't the same

        • setgree 2 hours ago |
          They still could have called, and the shelter could have as well.
      • walrus01 9 hours ago |
        > Wording could be taken either way, and I could be wrong, but it almost sounds like the dog was not on the property of its owner, and was over the fence in the neighbours property?

        The concept of being on ranch property gets a bit nebulous in Wyoming when you realize much private land is checkerboarded with blm land and the ranchers have long term blm grazing leases. The dog being outside the rancher's private property doesn't mean it's not out doing its job.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkerboarding_(land)

      • setgree 2 hours ago |
        > if one turns up on my property, I trap it and send it to the shelter specifically so the owner gets fined, even though I know who owns it.

        I don’t know the full story here, but have you tried talking to your neighbor? Like, really tried in a way that takes their perspective seriously? Because what you’ve described here is essentially guaranteed to make the relationship worse and likely to cause other problems down the road. Heaven forbid you ever truly need this person’s help, you’re going to be in a tough spot.

    • coffeefirst 10 hours ago |
      Correct.

      There's a big fluffy white dog in my neighbhorhood who has a talent for jumping the fence. I've returned him 3 times. This is not hard... once you determine he's friendly and just on an adventure the phone number is on his tag.

      He's a good boy.

      • throw9373939 9 hours ago |
        If you bring the dog back, owner has zero motivation to fix fence. With shelter they at least had to put some effort as punishment.

        Friendly is irelevant, some "friendly" dogs are quite dangerous!

        • werrett 9 hours ago |
          Or you could, you know, just ask the dog owner like human-to-human?

          I would like the think a tagged dog in the shelter has zero risk of not being put down… But this story doesn’t give a great data point.

        • hmartin 9 hours ago |
          uh wut to all three sentences
        • idiotsecant 8 hours ago |
          The problem with humans is once you get them out of tribal units of <~100 people, they start thinking like this.

          Perhaps the biggest bug in the human firmware.

      • sudo_cowsay 9 hours ago |
        Talented dog
      • hackernud3s 9 hours ago |
        I guess it depends on the neighborhood but it never occurs to me to get involved in a situation like that, I figure he'll go home when he's hungry.
      • watwut 6 hours ago |
        I would not bother 3rd time.
    • spike021 10 hours ago |
      There are literally people in my apartment complex in California insisting we feed and provide water for the stray cats, squirrels, and raccoons (yes even the raccoons) because they "can't live on their own" and then are concerned when any of those turn up dead because local coyotes know where the food is.
      • polloxtroy 9 hours ago |
        Feed the raccoons sir or ma'am
    • junofan 10 hours ago |
      I have one of these dogs. They’re basically treated like livestock in some places, not pets. Also they’re extremely clever and capable of having and executing on “ideas.” People put 2 GPS collars on them for a reason. It’s not inconceivable this one got loose, was in rough shape (covered in burrs, scratches, lean) and to anyone’s eyes needed to see a professional. But who knows, as you said.
    • dmkolobov 10 hours ago |
      Honestly that tracks. People in the US are often very judgemental of the way others treat dogs, and will not hesitate to involve themselves.
      • kashunstva 6 hours ago |
        > People in the US are often very judgemental of the way others treat dogs,

        Maybe because the incidence of actual neglect and abuse is non-zero; and if you have an affinity for them, it’s hard to turn a blind eye. But I suppose it results in some situations that aren’t perceived accurately.

        • mapotofu 2 hours ago |
          I think it would be better to do this with children than with dogs, and I wish more people did. Why do you think more people say this about dogs than children?
  • julianlam 11 hours ago |
    > “She picked up what she thought was a stray dog that she thought was malnourished,” Wissner said.

    Doesn't help that pet dogs spend much of their time laying down, with perhaps a couple brief respites in the form of a gentle walk.

    They gain weight.

    A healthy dog can often look malnourished to pet owners.

    • Loughla 11 hours ago |
      Our largest dog is extremely active. He is a great bird and rabbit dog and he runs and runs and runs when we're not hunting. He'll follow the tractor for miles back and forth in the field. He's skinny but, according to the vet, exactly where he should be in weight.

      Our neighbor's mom called the animal warden on us for not feeding him. He eats better than I do.

      Her dog is a morbidly obese miniature collie.

      Most people's perspective of ideal animal shapes is incorrect.

    • skylurk 4 hours ago |
      > spend much of their time laying down, with perhaps a couple brief respites in the form of a gentle walk

      relatable

  • gverrilla 10 hours ago |
    I know nothing about such dogs or farms, but why would he allow the dog to go beyond the property fence, even though it was still his property? Why include that on the limits of the property that takes 1 to 2 years to teach?
    • WillPostForFood 10 hours ago |
      Dog has free will, and it is impossible to make an dog-tight fence around an entire ranch.
    • defrost 10 hours ago |
      Farming properties are large, grazing paddocks are much smaller and many - some are even "virtual" - defined by GPS shock collars on stock.

      Dogs are smart and learn outer boundaries and roam looking for predators, stock are kept bounded and once an area is cropped (to some degree) they are moved to another grazing area.

    • jandrewrogers 10 hours ago |
      Dogs are smart, curious, and capable. They also understand boundaries. If you have a large property it is surprisingly difficult to prevent a motivated dog from leaving it. Some dogs have a strong desire to go on a walkabout on occasion. Chaining a farm dog defeats their purpose, and is arguably inhumane, so for some of them it just comes with the territory.

      We had one dog growing up that liked to commune with a particular herd of cattle (in a friendly way) in a distant field on occasion, and nobody and nothing could stop it when it had that inclination. Dog on a mission.

  • lynx97 10 hours ago |
    While we are at it, blind guidedog users would like to remind you that you really shouldn't walk up to a working dog and stop the owner to pet the dog. They get their share of love, no worries. What you are doing right now is obstructing the owners path, stealing their time, and possibly confusing the dog to a point where you are creating a dangerous sitatuion. But, seriously, it is likely useless to tell such stories these days. Those people to selfish or stupid to do these acts will NEVER read these messages, nor will they actually understand whats going on.
  • mikeweiss 10 hours ago |
    Sounds like they need GPS trackers on their collars. Or if cost is a concern, a simple air tag would do since most people 'rescuing' them likely have an iphone
  • nukanse 9 hours ago |
    The solution are polar bears that protect the dogs from being stolen. And anacondas to protect the bears from PETA.
  • isolay 9 hours ago |
    Give that dog a Do Not Rescue collar.
    • aembleton 5 hours ago |
      It already had a collar with the owners details. They could have just contacted them.
  • andai 8 hours ago |
    > Wissner drove the 30 miles into Cheyenne to retrieve his working dog that had been taken from his property – and paid a fine to get her back.

    Kinda sounds like the guy that stole the dog — and endangered a herd! — should get the fine.

  • zombot 8 hours ago |
    We clearly need a New Internet Startup with the usual main business of subscriptions, ads and selling user data, with an ancillary side business of selling GPS dog collars.

    Of course the collar needs to be a physical product that actually works, but if it doesn't, you can have AI hallucinate the coordinates. See, there's even a pretext for bringing AI in the mix, so why isn't this solved already?