The endorsements by the popular YT people, the Steam gaming, the Windows constantly getting bad rep and the LLMs making it easy to fix things that actually make Linux finally a really good option for a wider audience.
A Linux user has access to a huge ecosystem of software they could pay to add any feature to they wanted, especially with the capabilities of self hosted LLMs these days.
Why would anyone with this much freedom pay money for proprietary software they are not allowed to change, with no external accountability it is free of backdoors and can be maintained long term?
This is so strange to me.
Your comment reads like a vegan trying to moral grandstand over meat eaters. IME it’s unlikely to do much except annoy anyone who’s not already aligned with your viewpoints.
My question remains. What is the appeal of paying someone for proprietary software anymore when you could pay dramatically less or nothing to get exactly the software you want because of the hard work of the FOSS community?
Selling binaries is no longer a viable business model anymore for a technical customer, or so I thought.
You thought wrong. I'm not gonna vibecode my own Photoshop, nor am I gonna be happy with the FOSS alternatives. Spending what I make in a few hours of work to have a commercial product that satisfies all my need still is a savvy business and time-saving investment.
I'm a hardcore Linux user, though over time I stopped being so strict on the ideology side, especially since it's become clear that it's because of FOSS that Big Tech has grown so large, greedy and complacent. It's because of FOSS that selling software hasn't really been viable for decades.
I'd rather pay smaller companies for their product, than stubbornly stick to FOSS-only, which indirectly goes to support Big Tech and the destruction of small businesses.
My own companies are 100% FOSS by the way. Hackers with spare time will immediately see how to use it for free in their own homelabs, but the companies with more money than time would rather pay us than figure out how to run complex systems that require multiple people to manage securely in production. Everyone wins.
IMO an ethical business provides value in convenience without us having to take user freedoms away. Small companies acting like the big ones does not make me want to give them money personally. I -only- pay for software if it is FOSS.
This is new, it wasn't like that last year. But this year? People who have SteamDeck, saw it works, and then went and installed Linux on their own devices.
All else being equal I do prefer the F/LOSS alternative - and even pay extra for it - but I am not against paying for an obviously-superior proprietary alternative. The real question has always been "Do the F/LOSS alternatives to this proprietary Windows-only software suck badly enough that dual-booting the nightmare that is Windows is the lesser evil?", and in a lot of cases my conclusion has been that the preferred option is to... not use any version.
To give a concrete example: FreeCAD is basically unusable, and Fusion 360 is the obviously-superior proprietary alternative which doesn't run on Linux. Do I want to design my own 3D-printable parts badly enough to deal with Windows so that I can use Fusion 360? Ehhh, I think I'll just stick to mostly printing ready-made assemblies I download off the internet. Would I pay €10 / month for a hobbyists Linux version of Fusion 360 (which is free for Windows and macOS)? Heck yeah, zero doubt!
> I have no meaningful influence over the products I buy in the supermarket
I have talked to staff at small markets to stock items that give me reason to shop there more often. It is amazing what people will do for regulars.
> or my apartment building's elevator programming
Hacked elevators many times. You can buy elevator operator keys for most cities on ebay. Look for pentesters keychains.
> or the entertainment cluster of modern cars.
I have jailbroken or replaced systems like these more times than I can count.
> FreeCAD is basically unusable
I use FreeCAD to make things all the time, and it is easy to hook up automation tools and scripts to. It has come a very long way in the past couple of years.
Because getting the F/LOSS alternative to feature-parity is going to require a multi-million-dollar investment, and using the proprietary product is $30 / month?
This really isn't rocket science. You're not going to get tens of thousands of people to throw $10 / month at random borderline-MVP F/LOSS projects in the hope that they'll eventually mature - especially when there isn't even anything resembling a mature project management structure around it. Without serious corporate backing, most of those projects will go absolutely nowhere.
That may have been true a year ago, but these days FOSS software can be extended by anyone with a GPU and some imagination, or any proprietary software can be rapidly reverse engineered and clean-roomed as open source. I have added features to most software I use every day.
If anything, at the bare minimum you're still going to need to pay a domain expert to judge the LLM's design documents. A hands-off "Clone Adobe Premiere Pro, make no mistakes." might eventually result in something vaguely Premiere Pro-shaped, but Good Luck convincing any members of the project's F/LOSS community to play whack-a-mole with your unmaintainable LLM dump to actually make it work.
For instance, even if it triples the wall time, you can say "Generate mathematical proofs for every function" and watch it fix a ton of its own bugs.
I have added tons of features to FOSS software I use with my own consumer GPUs and that is only going to get easier and require less hand holding to get correct and maintainable output.
There is indeed a middle ground between yolo one shots and hand coding every line and hand debugging every error.
As a Linux OS maintainer myself, LLMs have made debugging and fixing obscure bugs 100x faster freeing me up for more time to solve new problems.
Torvalds also committed code that doesn't compile. So I dunno if the quality bar actually is as high.
I also use software that just runs better out of the box on macos than on linux..
The integration with the iphone is pretty nice, I copy something on my phone, I paste on my macbook, you can probably do that with android + linux but idk how.
They finally gave up enforcing software rules with me and I became the one exception allowed to install Linux.
Complete opposite for me.
On NixOS I enable KDE with i3 and rofi, and there's little to adjust.
On MacOS, I need yabai, karabiner, raycast, shottr (costs money), one of those hideous tray management tools that work by capturing your screen (facepalm)... For yabai I need to disable system integrity protection. With every update my setup breaks, and I need to spend countless hours debugging and setting everything up again... And it's still subpar to what I could have in Linux.
Yes, if an app works for you, awesome, and it’s obviously ideal to use open stuff. But we live in a society and as good as PDFs are, you’re probably not going to get a print shop to install Scribus just because you want them to.
(Affinity, it should be noted, is free to use, but closed-source.)
Context if it helps: https://www.404media.co/the-weird-way-the-404-media-zine-was...